In the context of the trial taking place in General Roca/Fiske Menuco, a series of arbitrary actions by the Tribunal have been evidenced, leading to controversy. During the hearings, situations have been reported that have sparked criticism and discomfort among the parties involved in the process.
Among the identified irregularities, it stands out that the Prosecutions did not present relevant evidence for their case, which has generated a debate about the validity and transparency of the trial. Furthermore, it has been mentioned that witnesses for the Prosecution have been allowed to read their statements using visual aids, a situation that has been a subject of controversy among the parties.
It has been reported that the publicity of the Debate has been limited, preventing the press and the general public from following the process. Additionally, it has been pointed out that a minor, known as Machi Betiana, was accused at the time of the events subject to the trial, which has generated tensions in the development of the proceedings.
Moreover, it has been reported that the Tribunal has made decisions that have limited the presentation of evidence and the dissemination of the hearings, generating discontent among the parties involved in the trial. The accusations of irregularities and lack of transparency have been supported by the defenses and the prosecutions throughout the process.
Amidst these controversies, the judicial presentation made by the president of National Parks, Cristian Larsen, stands out, who requested the removal of a sacred ceremonial space – rewe – to his jurisdiction. This action has added tension to the ongoing judicial process.
Despite the difficulties and disputes surrounding the development of the trial, it is expected that the evaluation of the relevant evidence and testimonies will continue to clarify the facts and reach a satisfactory resolution for all parties involved. The dynamics of the trial have been questioned and are being monitored by the community and the media.
